Lusha vs Pubrio
Lusha vs Pubrio, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lusha is on 70/100 and Pubrio on 39/100.
Where each one leads
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 17/100
- headcount: 358 against 14
- funding raised: $245M against $68K
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 1,783
Pubrio
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 47/100
At a glance
| Measure | Lusha | Pubrio |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. | Pubrio is a B2B data platform that provides sales intelligence and lead generation by turning expansion signals across 200+ markets into a live graph, helping revenue teams identify companies entering new markets and act on timely opportunities. |
| Category | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider | Sales Intelligence, Lead Generation, B2B Data, Market Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Hong Kong, Hong Kong |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lusha | Pubrio |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 358 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $245M | $68K |
| Latest round | Series B | Accelerator/Incubator |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,037 | 1,783 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lusha | Pubrio |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 52/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 17/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lusha | Pubrio |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Lusha vs Pubrio: common questions
Which is better, Lusha or Pubrio?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lusha and Pubrio compare on the numbers?
Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 39/100), domain rating (74/100 against 17/100), headcount (358 against 14), funding raised ($245M against $68K), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 1,783). Pubrio leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 47/100).
Read the full Lusha review and pricing or the Pubrio review and pricing. You can also browse other Lusha alternatives we track.