Lusha vs Mattermark
Lusha vs Mattermark, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lusha is on 70/100 and Mattermark on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 358 against 5
- funding raised: $245M against $15.8M
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 4,832
Mattermark
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lusha | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. | Sales intelligence and deal sourcing platform for investors, sales, and marketing professionals. |
| Category | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider | Sales Intelligence, Lead Generation, Business Intelligence, Data Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lusha | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 358 | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $245M | $15.8M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $42.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,037 | 4,832 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lusha | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 52/100 | 53/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lusha | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Segment, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Lusha vs Mattermark: common questions
Which is better, Lusha or Mattermark?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lusha and Mattermark compare on the numbers?
Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 60/100), headcount (358 against 5), funding raised ($245M against $15.8M), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 4,832).
Read the full Lusha review and pricing or the Mattermark review and pricing. You can also browse other Lusha alternatives we track.