Lunit vs Ultromics
Lunit vs Ultromics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lunit is on 61/100 and Ultromics on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Lunit
- our overall score: 61/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 370 against 84
- funding raised: $1.1B against $103M
Ultromics
- LinkedIn following: 9,821 against 829
At a glance
| Measure | Lunit | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Lunit is a medical AI company developing AI-powered solutions for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. | AI-powered software for cardiac ultrasound analysis and diagnosis. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Biotech | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Seoul, South Korea | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lunit | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 370 | 84 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.1B | $103M |
| Latest round | Rights Offering | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 829 | 9,821 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lunit | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 59/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 53/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lunit | Ultromics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Zendesk, HubSpot | HubSpot |
Lunit vs Ultromics: common questions
Which is better, Lunit or Ultromics?
On our 0-100 score Lunit rates higher (61/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lunit and Ultromics compare on the numbers?
Lunit leads on our overall score (61/100 against 50/100), domain rating (63/100 against 50/100), headcount (370 against 84), funding raised ($1.1B against $103M). Ultromics leads on LinkedIn following (9,821 against 829).
Read the full Lunit review and pricing or the Ultromics review and pricing. You can also browse other Lunit alternatives we track.