Lunar.dev vs Pingnode
Lunar.dev vs Pingnode, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lunar.dev is on 54/100 and Pingnode on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Lunar.dev
- our overall score: 54/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 44/100
Pingnode
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lunar.dev | Pingnode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Monitors and remediates issues with third-party APIs, focusing on breaking changes, latency, and costs. | Watch web pages, HTTP uptime, MCP servers, and AI agent workflows from one workspace. AI summaries, EU AI Act compliance audit chain, native iOS app — without the SaaS sprawl. |
| Category | Enterprise, API, Cybersecurity, API Platform | AI Observability, AI Governance, AI Agent, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lunar.dev | Pingnode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +66.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $6.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,250 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lunar.dev | Pingnode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lunar.dev | Pingnode |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Lunar.dev vs Pingnode: common questions
Which is better, Lunar.dev or Pingnode?
On our 0-100 score Lunar.dev rates higher (54/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lunar.dev and Pingnode compare on the numbers?
Lunar.dev leads on our overall score (54/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Lunar.dev review and pricing or the Pingnode review and pricing. You can also browse other Lunar.dev alternatives we track.