LUA AI vs Mastra
LUA AI vs Mastra, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LUA AI is on 35/100 and Mastra on 77/100.
Where each one leads
LUA AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $35.5M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Build an AI agent that helps automate tasks and interactions. | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Foundation Model, Generative AI | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +204.5% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $35.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 38/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 68/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | No | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular |
What users say
| Measure | LUA AI | Mastra |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
LUA AI vs Mastra: common questions
Which is better, LUA AI or Mastra?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LUA AI and Mastra compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($35.5M against $1.0M).
Read the full LUA AI review and pricing or the Mastra review and pricing. You can also browse other LUA AI alternatives we track.