LogicMonitor vs Riverbed Technology
LogicMonitor vs Riverbed Technology, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LogicMonitor is on 62/100 and Riverbed Technology on 57/100.
Where each one leads
LogicMonitor
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $1.7B against $100M
Riverbed Technology
- headcount: 1,589 against 1,229
At a glance
| Measure | LogicMonitor | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered hybrid observability platform for unified IT infrastructure visibility and proactive management. | Unified observability platform for autonomous IT operations. |
| Category | Cloud Monitoring & Observability, Observability, IT Operations Management, Cloud Monitoring | Network Management, Observability, Artificial Intelligence, IT Operations Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2006 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, United States | San Jose, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LogicMonitor | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,229 | 1,589 |
| Total funding | $1.7B | $100M |
| Latest round | Not published | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 101,613 | 118,733 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LogicMonitor | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LogicMonitor | Riverbed Technology |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
LogicMonitor vs Riverbed Technology: common questions
Which is better, LogicMonitor or Riverbed Technology?
On our 0-100 score LogicMonitor rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LogicMonitor and Riverbed Technology compare on the numbers?
LogicMonitor leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($1.7B against $100M). Riverbed Technology leads on headcount (1,589 against 1,229).
Read the full LogicMonitor review and pricing or the Riverbed Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other LogicMonitor alternatives we track.