LiveView Technologies vs Verkada
LiveView Technologies vs Verkada, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LiveView Technologies is on 30/100 and Verkada on 56/100.
Where each one leads
LiveView Technologies
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 44/100
Verkada
- our overall score: 56/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 57/100
At a glance
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | Verkada |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | LiveView Technologies is a video surveillance company based in Orem, Utah. It was founded by Ryan Porter and Bob Brenner in 2005. | AI-powered physical security platform for enterprises, integrating cameras, access control, and sensors. |
| Category | Video Surveillance, Public Safety, AI, Computer Vision | Physical Security, Enterprise Software, AI, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | platform | Software | hardware | platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Orem, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | Verkada |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 707 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $769M |
| Latest round | Not published | Later Stage VC |
| Valuation | Not published | $6K |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,078 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | Verkada |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | Not published |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | Verkada |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Qualtrics | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
LiveView Technologies vs Verkada: common questions
Which is better, LiveView Technologies or Verkada?
On our 0-100 score Verkada rates higher (56/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LiveView Technologies and Verkada compare on the numbers?
LiveView Technologies leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 44/100). Verkada leads on our overall score (56/100 against 30/100), domain rating (75/100 against 57/100).
Read the full LiveView Technologies review and pricing or the Verkada review and pricing. You can also browse other LiveView Technologies alternatives we track.