LiveView Technologies vs NoTraffic
LiveView Technologies vs NoTraffic, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LiveView Technologies is on 30/100 and NoTraffic on 65/100.
Where each one leads
LiveView Technologies
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 57/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 707 against 157
- LinkedIn following: 22,078 against 6,563
NoTraffic
- our overall score: 65/100 against 30/100
At a glance
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | NoTraffic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | LiveView Technologies is a video surveillance company based in Orem, Utah. It was founded by Ryan Porter and Bob Brenner in 2005. | AI-powered traffic management platform that transforms city traffic signals into a real-time intelligent network to reduce congestion, cut emissions, and improve road safety. |
| Category | Video Surveillance, Public Safety, AI, Computer Vision | Artificial Intelligence, Smart City, Traffic Management, Mobility |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2G |
| Offering | Software | hardware | platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2005 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Orem, United States | Overland Park, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | NoTraffic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 707 | 157 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +61.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $161M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 22,078 | 6,563 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | NoTraffic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 30/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 100/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LiveView Technologies | NoTraffic |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Qualtrics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
LiveView Technologies vs NoTraffic: common questions
Which is better, LiveView Technologies or NoTraffic?
On our 0-100 score NoTraffic rates higher (65/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LiveView Technologies and NoTraffic compare on the numbers?
LiveView Technologies leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 21/100), domain rating (57/100 against 45/100), headcount (707 against 157), LinkedIn following (22,078 against 6,563). NoTraffic leads on our overall score (65/100 against 30/100).
Read the full LiveView Technologies review and pricing or the NoTraffic review and pricing. You can also browse other LiveView Technologies alternatives we track.