Livecycle vs Overops
Livecycle vs Overops, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Livecycle is on 46/100 and Overops on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Livecycle
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Overops
- our overall score: 59/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 51 against 4
- headcount growth: +60.0% against -66.5%
- LinkedIn following: 2,165 against 571
At a glance
| Measure | Livecycle | Overops |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates live, collaborative development environments from every pull request. | Harness provides an AI-powered software delivery platform that automates the entire software development lifecycle for engineering and DevOps teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Developer Tools, DevOps | Enterprise, Development, Software Lifecycle, Coding |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Livecycle | Overops |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 51 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -66.5% | +60.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $49.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 571 | 2,165 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Livecycle | Overops |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 7/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Livecycle | Overops |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Livecycle | Overops |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“Has anyone here used Overops?. Talked to a rep a few days ago, though I wasn't sure if it was worth the cost. We currently have a hodge podge of tools that we use for testing and QA, was wondering if others have some experience with it or a”r/devops
Livecycle vs Overops: common questions
Which is better, Livecycle or Overops?
On our 0-100 score Overops rates higher (59/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Livecycle and Overops compare on the numbers?
Overops leads on our overall score (59/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 32/100), domain rating (78/100 against 46/100), headcount (51 against 4), headcount growth (+60.0% against -66.5%), LinkedIn following (2,165 against 571).
What do real users say about Livecycle and Overops?
Overops: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Livecycle review and pricing or the Overops review and pricing. You can also browse other Livecycle alternatives we track.