Listory vs OpenWeb
Listory vs OpenWeb, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Listory is on 46/100 and OpenWeb on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Listory
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OpenWeb
- our overall score: 63/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 251 against 2
- headcount growth: -9.0% against -31.5%
- funding raised: $398M against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 29,086 against 288
At a glance
| Measure | Listory | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Content curation app that refines and personalizes meaningful stories for users. | OpenWeb partners with publishers and brands to foster healthy online conversations and build direct audience relationships. |
| Category | Media, Content Curation, Personal, Personalization | Media, Text Recognition, Text, Content Moderation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Listory | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 251 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -31.5% | -9.0% |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $398M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 288 | 29,086 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Listory | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Listory | OpenWeb |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Listory vs OpenWeb: common questions
Which is better, Listory or OpenWeb?
On our 0-100 score OpenWeb rates higher (63/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Listory and OpenWeb compare on the numbers?
OpenWeb leads on our overall score (63/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 31/100), domain rating (71/100 against 5/100), headcount (251 against 2), headcount growth (-9.0% against -31.5%), funding raised ($398M against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (29,086 against 288).
Read the full Listory review and pricing or the OpenWeb review and pricing. You can also browse other Listory alternatives we track.