Liquivant vs OpenGamma
Liquivant vs OpenGamma, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Liquivant is on 21/100 and OpenGamma on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Liquivant
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OpenGamma
- our overall score: 60/100 against 21/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | Liquivant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Liquidity solution for institutional cash, reimagining vantage for financial institutions. | Provides a cloud-native platform for risk analytics and derivatives trading for financial institutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Institutional Finance, Cash Management, Liquidity Management | Fintech, Risk Management, Derivatives Trading, Financial Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Not published | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Liquivant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 51 |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 43,803 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Liquivant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Liquivant | OpenGamma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Liquivant vs OpenGamma: common questions
Which is better, Liquivant or OpenGamma?
On our 0-100 score OpenGamma rates higher (60/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Liquivant and OpenGamma compare on the numbers?
OpenGamma leads on our overall score (60/100 against 21/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 24/100).
Read the full Liquivant review and pricing or the OpenGamma review and pricing. You can also browse other Liquivant alternatives we track.