Linx Security vs WideField Security
Linx Security vs WideField Security, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Linx Security is on 55/100 and WideField Security on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Linx Security
- our overall score: 55/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $89.0M against $14.3M
WideField Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Linx Security | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-native identity security and governance platform for human, machine, and AI agents. | Extends identity security platform to cover autonomous AI agents. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Identity Management, Identity & Access Management, AI-driven Security | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Identity Management, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Sunnyvale, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Linx Security | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 87 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +113.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $89.0M | $14.3M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,085 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Linx Security | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Linx Security | WideField Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Linx Security vs WideField Security: common questions
Which is better, Linx Security or WideField Security?
On our 0-100 score Linx Security rates higher (55/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Linx Security and WideField Security compare on the numbers?
Linx Security leads on our overall score (55/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 35/100), domain rating (39/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($89.0M against $14.3M).
Read the full Linx Security review and pricing or the WideField Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Linx Security alternatives we track.