Lightricks vs Pixeflare
Lightricks vs Pixeflare, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lightricks is on 71/100 and Pixeflare on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Lightricks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 21/100
Pixeflare
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lightricks | Pixeflare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Jerusalem-based AI creative technology company behind Facetune, Photoleap, and Videoleap, with open-source video generation models (LTX Video) powering next-generation creator workflows. | Professional video editing, short-form content, motion graphics, and creative design services to scale your brand. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Creative Technology, Generative AI, AI Video Generation | Video Editing, Content Creation, Motion Graphics, Creative Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Jerusalem, Israel | Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lightricks | Pixeflare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 554 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $335M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,563 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lightricks | Pixeflare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lightricks | Pixeflare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Lightricks vs Pixeflare: common questions
Which is better, Lightricks or Pixeflare?
On our 0-100 score Lightricks rates higher (71/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lightricks and Pixeflare compare on the numbers?
Lightricks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Lightricks review and pricing or the Pixeflare review and pricing. You can also browse other Lightricks alternatives we track.