Lightricks vs Magnific
Lightricks vs Magnific, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lightricks is on 71/100 and Magnific on 17/100.
Where each one leads
Lightricks
- our overall score: 71/100 against 17/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 554 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 33,563 against 18,131
Magnific
- domain rating: 92/100 against 72/100
At a glance
| Measure | Lightricks | Magnific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Jerusalem-based AI creative technology company behind Facetune, Photoleap, and Videoleap, with open-source video generation models (LTX Video) powering next-generation creator workflows. | An AI creative platform integrating image generation, video, audio, upscaling, collaboration, and 3D features into a single production environment. |
| Category | Artificial Intelligence, Creative Technology, Generative AI, AI Video Generation | Artificial Intelligence, Creative Technology, SaaS, Media & Entertainment |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Jerusalem, Israel | Málaga, Spain |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lightricks | Magnific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 554 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $335M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.8B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,563 | 18,131 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lightricks | Magnific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 17/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 51/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lightricks | Magnific |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Lightricks vs Magnific: common questions
Which is better, Lightricks or Magnific?
On our 0-100 score Lightricks rates higher (71/100 against 17/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lightricks and Magnific compare on the numbers?
Lightricks leads on our overall score (71/100 against 17/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 31/100), headcount (554 against 4), LinkedIn following (33,563 against 18,131). Magnific leads on domain rating (92/100 against 72/100).
Read the full Lightricks review and pricing or the Magnific review and pricing. You can also browse other Lightricks alternatives we track.