Lightelligence vs Neurophos
Lightelligence vs Neurophos, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lightelligence is on 69/100 and Neurophos on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Lightelligence
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 73 against 52
- funding raised: $221M against $124M
Neurophos
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 38/100
- headcount growth: +301.0% against +18.3%
At a glance
| Measure | Lightelligence | Neurophos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops optical chips and software for AI computing, accelerating computations with light. | Neurophos develops photonic AI chips (OPUs) for extreme efficiency and performance in AI compute. |
| Category | AI Hardware, AI Chip, Photonic Chip Design, Neuromorphic Computing | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Photonic Chip Design, Neural Network Accelerator |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | software | platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lightelligence | Neurophos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 73 | 52 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.3% | +301.0% |
| Total funding | $221M | $124M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,846 | 6,732 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lightelligence | Neurophos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lightelligence | Neurophos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
Lightelligence vs Neurophos: common questions
Which is better, Lightelligence or Neurophos?
On our 0-100 score Lightelligence rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lightelligence and Neurophos compare on the numbers?
Lightelligence leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), headcount (73 against 52), funding raised ($221M against $124M). Neurophos leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 37/100), domain rating (45/100 against 38/100), headcount growth (+301.0% against +18.3%).
Read the full Lightelligence review and pricing or the Neurophos review and pricing. You can also browse other Lightelligence alternatives we track.