Lightcyber vs SafeBreach
Lightcyber vs SafeBreach, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lightcyber is on 59/100 and SafeBreach on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Lightcyber
- domain rating: 88/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 22,682 against 141
- LinkedIn following: 1,930,924 against 23,010
SafeBreach
- funding raised: $141M against $35.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Lightcyber | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Palo Alto Networks acquired LightCyber, a cybersecurity company specializing in behavioral analytics for advanced threat detection. | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Behavioral Analytics | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lightcyber | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22,682 | 141 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $35.0M | $141M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D Extension |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,930,924 | 23,010 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lightcyber | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lightcyber | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Lightcyber vs SafeBreach: common questions
Which is better, Lightcyber or SafeBreach?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lightcyber and SafeBreach compare on the numbers?
Lightcyber leads on domain rating (88/100 against 71/100), headcount (22,682 against 141), LinkedIn following (1,930,924 against 23,010). SafeBreach leads on funding raised ($141M against $35.0M).
Read the full Lightcyber review and pricing or the SafeBreach review and pricing. You can also browse other Lightcyber alternatives we track.