LiGenTec vs Qnami
LiGenTec vs Qnami, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LiGenTec is on 60/100 and Qnami on 60/100.
Where each one leads
LiGenTec
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 84 against 19
- LinkedIn following: 12,350 against 6,119
Qnami
- domain rating: 43/100 against 36/100
- funding raised: $8.0M against $3.3M
At a glance
| Measure | LiGenTec | Qnami |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | LIGENTEC designs and manufactures low-loss silicon nitride photonic integrated circuits (PICs) for high-tech industries. | Quantum sensing microscope for nanoscale magnetic imaging and material analysis. |
| Category | Photonic Chip Design, Semiconductor, Advanced Manufacturing and Materials, Quantum Computing | Quantum Sensing, Nanotechnology, Materials Science, Scientific Instrumentation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Ecublens, Switzerland | Neuchâtel, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LiGenTec | Qnami |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +12.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $3.3M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Grant | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,350 | 6,119 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LiGenTec | Qnami |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LiGenTec | Qnami |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
LiGenTec vs Qnami: common questions
Which is better, LiGenTec or Qnami?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 18 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do LiGenTec and Qnami compare on the numbers?
LiGenTec leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 41/100), headcount (84 against 19), LinkedIn following (12,350 against 6,119). Qnami leads on domain rating (43/100 against 36/100), funding raised ($8.0M against $3.3M).
Read the full LiGenTec review and pricing or the Qnami review and pricing. You can also browse other LiGenTec alternatives we track.