Lidwave vs Trieye
Lidwave vs Trieye, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lidwave is on 54/100 and Trieye on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Lidwave
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Trieye
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 24/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 16/100
- headcount: 101 against 12
- funding raised: $96.0M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 10,032 against 2,294
At a glance
| Measure | Lidwave | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Deep-tech startup developing a novel 3D sensing architecture for perception industries. | Pioneering mass-market CMOS-based Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) sensing for automotive imaging. |
| Category | 3D, Sensor, 4D, LIDAR | Automotive, Imaging, ADAS, Camera |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Jerusalem, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lidwave | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 101 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $96.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,294 | 10,032 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lidwave | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 16/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lidwave | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Lidwave vs Trieye: common questions
Which is better, Lidwave or Trieye?
On our 0-100 score Trieye rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lidwave and Trieye compare on the numbers?
Trieye leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 24/100), domain rating (36/100 against 16/100), headcount (101 against 12), funding raised ($96.0M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (10,032 against 2,294).
Read the full Lidwave review and pricing or the Trieye review and pricing. You can also browse other Lidwave alternatives we track.