Li-Cycle vs tozero
Li-Cycle vs tozero, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Li-Cycle is on 34/100 and tozero on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Li-Cycle
- funding raised: $275M against $63.0M
tozero
- our overall score: 55/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Li-Cycle | tozero |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Li-Cycle is a lithium-ion battery resource recovery company that recycles batteries to create a closed-loop supply chain. | Turning end-of-life batteries into a domestic supply of critical raw materials at scale. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Resource Recovery, Circular Economy, Clean Energy | Battery Recycling, Critical Raw Materials, Circular Economy, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Li-Cycle | tozero |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 30 |
| Total funding | $275M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Li-Cycle | tozero |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Li-Cycle | tozero |
|---|---|---|
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
Li-Cycle vs tozero: common questions
Which is better, Li-Cycle or tozero?
On our 0-100 score tozero rates higher (55/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Li-Cycle and tozero compare on the numbers?
Li-Cycle leads on funding raised ($275M against $63.0M). tozero leads on our overall score (55/100 against 34/100).
Read the full Li-Cycle review and pricing or the tozero review and pricing. You can also browse other Li-Cycle alternatives we track.