Li-Cycle vs Redwood Materials
Li-Cycle vs Redwood Materials, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Li-Cycle is on 34/100 and Redwood Materials on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Li-Cycle
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Redwood Materials
- our overall score: 59/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $1.1B against $275M
At a glance
| Measure | Li-Cycle | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Li-Cycle is a lithium-ion battery resource recovery company that recycles batteries to create a closed-loop supply chain. | Recycling and refining battery materials for electric vehicles and energy storage. |
| Category | Battery Recycling, Resource Recovery, Circular Economy, Clean Energy | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, EV Charging, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Carson City, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Li-Cycle | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 773 |
| Total funding | $275M | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Post IPO | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 78,725 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Li-Cycle | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Li-Cycle | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Nuxt |
Li-Cycle vs Redwood Materials: common questions
Which is better, Li-Cycle or Redwood Materials?
On our 0-100 score Redwood Materials rates higher (59/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Li-Cycle and Redwood Materials compare on the numbers?
Redwood Materials leads on our overall score (59/100 against 34/100), domain rating (68/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($1.1B against $275M).
Read the full Li-Cycle review and pricing or the Redwood Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other Li-Cycle alternatives we track.