Levels Health vs Lifebeam Vi
Levels Health vs Lifebeam Vi, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Levels Health is on 52/100 and Lifebeam Vi on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Levels Health
- domain rating: 72/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $233M against $38.7M
Lifebeam Vi
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Levels Health | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Personalized health and wellness platform focused on continuous glucose monitoring and metabolic health. | Vi-Labs provides enterprise AI for health, supercharging digital health companies with engagement, retention, and LTV solutions. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Digital Health | Fitness, Wearable, HealthTech, MedTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Levels Health | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 193 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +67.4% |
| Total funding | $233M | $38.7M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 13,264 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Levels Health | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Levels Health | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Helpscout | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Levels Health | Lifebeam Vi |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Lifebeam Vi Wraps Kickstarter As The Most Well-Funded Fitness Wearable Ever.”r/wearables
Levels Health vs Lifebeam Vi: common questions
Which is better, Levels Health or Lifebeam Vi?
On our 0-100 score Lifebeam Vi rates higher (53/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Levels Health and Lifebeam Vi compare on the numbers?
Levels Health leads on domain rating (72/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($233M against $38.7M). Lifebeam Vi leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100).
What do real users say about Levels Health and Lifebeam Vi?
Lifebeam Vi: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/wearables.
Read the full Levels Health review and pricing or the Lifebeam Vi review and pricing. You can also browse other Levels Health alternatives we track.