leap.new vs Lightspin
leap.new vs Lightspin, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: leap.new is on 53/100 and Lightspin on 57/100.
Where each one leads
leap.new
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 38/100
Lightspin
- our overall score: 57/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 21 against 1
- funding raised: $60.0M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,595 against 2,450
At a glance
| Measure | leap.new | Lightspin |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI developer agent that builds and deploys production-grade applications to your cloud. | Cloud security platform for SaaS companies, prioritizing and remediating risks with an attack path engine. |
| Category | AI Agent, Agentic AI, Developer Tools, Cloud Infrastructure | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Kubernetes, Microservices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | leap.new | Lightspin |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -28.3% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $60.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,450 | 5,595 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | leap.new | Lightspin |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | leap.new | Lightspin |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | leap.new | Lightspin |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Developer Agent, Production-Grade Apps, Cloud Deployment, Open Source Support, Prisma ORM Integration, PostHog Integration | Not published |
leap.new vs Lightspin: common questions
Which is better, leap.new or Lightspin?
On our 0-100 score Lightspin rates higher (57/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do leap.new and Lightspin compare on the numbers?
leap.new leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 38/100). Lightspin leads on our overall score (57/100 against 53/100), domain rating (91/100 against 45/100), headcount (21 against 1), funding raised ($60.0M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (5,595 against 2,450).
Read the full leap.new review and pricing or the Lightspin review and pricing. You can also browse other leap.new alternatives we track.