Lava Network vs StarkWare
Lava Network vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lava Network is on 48/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Lava Network
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 30/100
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 194 against 24
- headcount growth: +15.6% against -5.7%
- funding raised: $180M against $27.0M
- LinkedIn following: 20,607 against 3,705
At a glance
| Measure | Lava Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Decentralized blockchain infrastructure protocol for reliable data access, especially for AI agents and dApps. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Infrastructure, Blockchain Infrastructure, Decentralized Data | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lava Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 24 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.7% | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $180M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,705 | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lava Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lava Network | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Lava Network vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Lava Network or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lava Network and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Lava Network leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 30/100). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 48/100), domain rating (71/100 against 55/100), headcount (194 against 24), headcount growth (+15.6% against -5.7%), funding raised ($180M against $27.0M), LinkedIn following (20,607 against 3,705).
Read the full Lava Network review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Lava Network alternatives we track.