LatHire vs Turing
LatHire vs Turing, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LatHire is on 21/100 and Turing on 71/100.
Where each one leads
LatHire
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 51/100
- headcount growth: +231.4% against +27.5%
Turing
- our overall score: 71/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 6,765 against 43
- LinkedIn following: 1,952,484 against 1,941
At a glance
| Measure | LatHire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform connecting US companies with top tech and generalist talent from Latin America. | AI-powered talent cloud connecting companies with pre-vetted remote software developers globally. |
| Category | Talent Marketplace, Remote Work, HR Tech, Staffing | Talent Cloud, Remote Work, AI-Powered Hiring, Developer Talent |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Lewes, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LatHire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 43 | 6,765 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +231.4% | +27.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $395M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,941 | 1,952,484 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LatHire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 21/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 18/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 54/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LatHire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | LatHire | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 4.0/5 from 1 vote |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Thinking of making a few remote hires through LatHire. Would appreciate feedback from anyone who’s used them!. Has anyone used sites like Lathire.com to hire VAs or social media managers?”r/RecruitmentHub
LatHire vs Turing: common questions
Which is better, LatHire or Turing?
On our 0-100 score Turing rates higher (71/100 against 21/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LatHire and Turing compare on the numbers?
LatHire leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 51/100), headcount growth (+231.4% against +27.5%). Turing leads on our overall score (71/100 against 21/100), domain rating (74/100 against 41/100), headcount (6,765 against 43), LinkedIn following (1,952,484 against 1,941).
What do real users say about LatHire and Turing?
LatHire: 0 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/RecruitmentHub.
Read the full LatHire review and pricing or the Turing review and pricing. You can also browse other LatHire alternatives we track.