Lapee vs TripleW
Lapee vs TripleW, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lapee is on 36/100 and TripleW on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Lapee
- funding raised: $50B against $16.5M
TripleW
- our overall score: 56/100 against 36/100
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Lapee | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Portable, eco-friendly toilets for outdoor events and festivals. | Upcycles food waste into high-value lactic acid using climate-transformative technology. |
| Category | Event Services, Sustainability, Waste Management, Portable Toilets | Life Sciences, Food Waste, Food, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lapee | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.5% |
| Total funding | $50B | $16.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 4,708 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lapee | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lapee | TripleW |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
Lapee vs TripleW: common questions
Which is better, Lapee or TripleW?
On our 0-100 score TripleW rates higher (56/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lapee and TripleW compare on the numbers?
Lapee leads on funding raised ($50B against $16.5M). TripleW leads on our overall score (56/100 against 36/100), agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Lapee review and pricing or the TripleW review and pricing. You can also browse other Lapee alternatives we track.