Lantern vs Virta
Lantern vs Virta, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lantern is on 41/100 and Virta on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Lantern
- LinkedIn following: 108,384 against 69,315
Virta
- our overall score: 66/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 903 against 689
- funding raised: $235M against $33.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Lantern | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Specialty care platform connecting patients with top providers, reducing costs and improving outcomes. | Reversing type 2 diabetes and other chronic metabolic diseases through personalized nutrition and remote care. |
| Category | HealthTech, Specialty Care, Healthcare Cost Reduction, Value-Based Care | HealthTech, Digital Health, Telemedicine, Chronic Disease Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Dallas, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lantern | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 689 | 903 |
| Total funding | $33.5M | $235M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 108,384 | 69,315 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lantern | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 14/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lantern | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Zendesk, HubSpot |
Lantern vs Virta: common questions
Which is better, Lantern or Virta?
On our 0-100 score Virta rates higher (66/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lantern and Virta compare on the numbers?
Lantern leads on LinkedIn following (108,384 against 69,315). Virta leads on our overall score (66/100 against 41/100), domain rating (72/100 against 58/100), headcount (903 against 689), funding raised ($235M against $33.5M).
Read the full Lantern review and pricing or the Virta review and pricing. You can also browse other Lantern alternatives we track.