Lansweeper vs Sitetracker
Lansweeper vs Sitetracker, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lansweeper is on 59/100 and Sitetracker on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Lansweeper
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $158M against $42.0M
Sitetracker
- LinkedIn following: 98,888 against 20,591
At a glance
| Measure | Lansweeper | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based IT asset management software provider. | Cloud-native platform for managing critical infrastructure asset lifecycles. |
| Category | Not published | Infrastructure Management, Utilities, Renewables, EV Charging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Belgium | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lansweeper | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 412 | 426 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.7% |
| Total funding | $158M | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,591 | 98,888 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lansweeper | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lansweeper | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Lansweeper | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“$IBDRY Iberdrola Renews and Expands Sitetracker Use to Help Manage Massive EV Charging Station Deployment Goals.”r/EV_Trading_Community
Lansweeper vs Sitetracker: common questions
Which is better, Lansweeper or Sitetracker?
On our 0-100 score Sitetracker rates higher (61/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lansweeper and Sitetracker compare on the numbers?
Lansweeper leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 42/100), domain rating (73/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($158M against $42.0M). Sitetracker leads on LinkedIn following (98,888 against 20,591).
What do real users say about Lansweeper and Sitetracker?
Sitetracker: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/EV_Trading_Community.
Read the full Lansweeper review and pricing or the Sitetracker review and pricing. You can also browse other Lansweeper alternatives we track.