Langfuse vs Swarmia
Langfuse vs Swarmia, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Langfuse is on 55/100 and Swarmia on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Langfuse
- our overall score: 55/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 69/100
- LinkedIn following: 13,143 against 3,521
Swarmia
- headcount: 63 against 21
- funding raised: $10.0M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Langfuse | Swarmia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source LLM engineering platform for debugging, monitoring, and improving production-grade LLM applications. | AI-powered platform for engineering team productivity and performance insights. |
| Category | MLOps, Observability, Developer Tools, API Platform | MLOps, Developer Tools, Analytics Platform, Business Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Langfuse | Swarmia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 21 | 63 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +81.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,143 | 3,521 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Langfuse | Swarmia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 58/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Langfuse | Swarmia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Langfuse | Swarmia |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Full Context Tracing, Cost & Latency Monitoring, Output Quality Evaluation, Prompt Management & Experimentation, Testing & Benchmarking | Not published |
Langfuse vs Swarmia: common questions
Which is better, Langfuse or Swarmia?
On our 0-100 score Langfuse rates higher (55/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Langfuse and Swarmia compare on the numbers?
Langfuse leads on our overall score (55/100 against 38/100), domain rating (79/100 against 69/100), LinkedIn following (13,143 against 3,521). Swarmia leads on headcount (63 against 21), funding raised ($10.0M against $2.5M).
Read the full Langfuse review and pricing or the Swarmia review and pricing. You can also browse other Langfuse alternatives we track.