Langfuse vs Langfuse GmbH
Langfuse vs Langfuse GmbH, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Langfuse is on 55/100 and Langfuse GmbH on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Langfuse
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Langfuse GmbH
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | Langfuse | Langfuse GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source LLM engineering platform for debugging, monitoring, and improving production-grade LLM applications. | Langfuse offers an open-source LLM engineering platform designed to help developers debug AI applications and agents. |
| Category | MLOps, Observability, Developer Tools, API Platform | MLOps, Observability, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Langfuse | Langfuse GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 21 | 19 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +81.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,143 | 12,138 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Langfuse | Langfuse GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 58/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Langfuse | Langfuse GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot, Crisp |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Langfuse | Langfuse GmbH |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Full Context Tracing, Cost & Latency Monitoring, Output Quality Evaluation, Prompt Management & Experimentation, Testing & Benchmarking | Not published |
Langfuse vs Langfuse GmbH: common questions
Which is better, Langfuse or Langfuse GmbH?
On our 0-100 score Langfuse GmbH rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Langfuse and Langfuse GmbH compare on the numbers?
Langfuse GmbH leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100).
Read the full Langfuse review and pricing or the Langfuse GmbH review and pricing. You can also browse other Langfuse alternatives we track.