Langflow vs LlamaIndex
Langflow vs LlamaIndex, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Langflow is on 32/100 and LlamaIndex on 33/100.
Where each one leads
Langflow
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
LlamaIndex
- domain rating: 81/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 78 against 17
- LinkedIn following: 259,243 against 16,421
At a glance
| Measure | Langflow | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Low-code platform for building, iterating, and deploying AI applications, especially RAG and multi-agent systems. | LlamaIndex empowers developers to build agents that extract insights and take action on complex enterprise documents, combining industry-leading parsing with a trusted agent framework. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent Builder, Automation, Low Code | Agentic AI, LLM Framework, AI Development Frameworks, Customer Service |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2020 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Lisbon, Portugal | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Langflow | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 17 | 78 |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,421 | 259,243 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Langflow | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 33/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 19/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Langflow | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Langflow | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Visual AI Workflow Builder, Extensive Tool & Model Support, Python Customization & Control, Rapid Iteration & Deployment, Docling Bundle for Document Processing, Windows Desktop Support | Document Parsing, Data Extraction, Agent Framework, Knowledge Management, Multi-modal Indexing, Automated Schema Generation |
Langflow vs LlamaIndex: common questions
Which is better, Langflow or LlamaIndex?
On our 0-100 score LlamaIndex rates higher (33/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Langflow and LlamaIndex compare on the numbers?
Langflow leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100). LlamaIndex leads on domain rating (81/100 against 72/100), headcount (78 against 17), LinkedIn following (259,243 against 16,421).
Read the full Langflow review and pricing or the LlamaIndex review and pricing. You can also browse other Langflow alternatives we track.