LangChain vs Phases
LangChain vs Phases, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LangChain is on 76/100 and Phases on 29/100.
Where each one leads
LangChain
- our overall score: 76/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 312 against 3
Phases
- agent readiness: 68/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | LangChain | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The platform for building reliable AI agents and LLM applications. | Phases is building the first full-stack AI agent company to automate clinical trials for pharma companies, starting with patient recruitment. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model | Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2022 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LangChain | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 312 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +260.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $260M | Not published |
| Valuation | $1K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 514,641 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LangChain | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 20/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 84/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 83/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | C (68/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LangChain | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Plausible | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | LangChain | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-Powered Patient Recruitment, Automated Medical Record Review, Efficient Screening Conversations, 24/7 Patient Engagement & Scalability, Seamless Integration, Cost Reduction & Trial Acceleration |
LangChain vs Phases: common questions
Which is better, LangChain or Phases?
On our 0-100 score LangChain rates higher (76/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LangChain and Phases compare on the numbers?
LangChain leads on our overall score (76/100 against 29/100), domain rating (86/100 against 22/100), headcount (312 against 3). Phases leads on agent readiness (68/100 against 42/100).
Read the full LangChain review and pricing or the Phases review and pricing. You can also browse other LangChain alternatives we track.