Laminar vs MinerEye
Laminar vs MinerEye, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Laminar is on 62/100 and MinerEye on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Laminar
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 25/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 34 against 5
- headcount growth: -8.2% against -21.3%
- funding raised: $70.0M against $14.6M
- LinkedIn following: 8,878 against 852
MinerEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Laminar | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agile data security platform providing cloud data visibility, classification, and protection. | MinerEye provides AI-powered data governance and protection solutions for unstructured and dark data across enterprise repositories. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, Data | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, Privacy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Laminar | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 5 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -8.2% | -21.3% |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $14.6M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,878 | 852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Laminar | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 41/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Laminar | MinerEye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Hetzner |
Laminar vs MinerEye: common questions
Which is better, Laminar or MinerEye?
On our 0-100 score Laminar rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Laminar and MinerEye compare on the numbers?
Laminar leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (25/100 against 21/100), domain rating (78/100 against 41/100), headcount (34 against 5), headcount growth (-8.2% against -21.3%), funding raised ($70.0M against $14.6M), LinkedIn following (8,878 against 852).
Read the full Laminar review and pricing or the MinerEye review and pricing. You can also browse other Laminar alternatives we track.