Lacework vs Sweet Security
Lacework vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lacework is on 54/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Lacework
- domain rating: 72/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 168 against 119
- funding raised: $1.3B against $128M
Sweet Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Lacework | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data-driven cloud security platform providing automated threat detection and compliance across multi-cloud environments. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | AI, SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lacework | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 168 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $1.3B | $128M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $8.3B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lacework | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lacework | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Lacework vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Lacework or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Sweet Security rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lacework and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Lacework leads on domain rating (72/100 against 47/100), headcount (168 against 119), funding raised ($1.3B against $128M). Sweet Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (39/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Lacework review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Lacework alternatives we track.