Lacework vs Porticor
Lacework vs Porticor, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lacework is on 54/100 and Porticor on 39/100.
Where each one leads
Lacework
- our overall score: 54/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 19/100
- funding raised: $1.3B against $7.0M
Porticor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lacework | Porticor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data-driven cloud security platform providing automated threat detection and compliance across multi-cloud environments. | Porticor provided cloud security solutions, including data encryption and key management, for enterprises migrating to public and private cloud environments. |
| Category | AI, SaaS, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Data Encryption |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lacework | Porticor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 168 | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.3B | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $8.3B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lacework | Porticor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 39/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 34/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 72/100 | 19/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lacework | Porticor |
|---|---|---|
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Lacework | Porticor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 1 thread |
“I'm asking because it seems that some of the main players are not supporting full MySQL DB encryption anymore (e.g. Porticor, Safenet, etc.) and AWS RDS + KMS does not support multi-REGION failover since the KMS is locked per region.”r/security
Lacework vs Porticor: common questions
Which is better, Lacework or Porticor?
On our 0-100 score Lacework rates higher (54/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lacework and Porticor compare on the numbers?
Lacework leads on our overall score (54/100 against 39/100), domain rating (72/100 against 19/100), funding raised ($1.3B against $7.0M).
What do real users say about Lacework and Porticor?
Porticor: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/security.
Read the full Lacework review and pricing or the Porticor review and pricing. You can also browse other Lacework alternatives we track.