LabCup vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
LabCup vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: LabCup is on 47/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.
Where each one leads
LabCup
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 22/100
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 26/100
- headcount: 100,104 against 18
- LinkedIn following: 2,298,918 against 215
At a glance
| Measure | LabCup | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Lab inventory management for life sciences and research universities. | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Laboratory Management, Inventory Management, Life Sciences | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 1956 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | LabCup | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 100,104 |
| Total funding | Not published | $5.5B |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $220B |
| LinkedIn followers | 215 | 2,298,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | LabCup | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 19/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | LabCup | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
LabCup vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions
Which is better, LabCup or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do LabCup and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?
LabCup leads on agent readiness (36/100 against 22/100). Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 47/100), domain rating (86/100 against 26/100), headcount (100,104 against 18), LinkedIn following (2,298,918 against 215).
Read the full LabCup review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other LabCup alternatives we track.