Kong vs WSO2
Kong vs WSO2, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kong is on 50/100 and WSO2 on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Kong
- funding raised: $511M against $63.0M
WSO2
- our overall score: 54/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 1,243 against 987
- LinkedIn following: 203,455 against 76,804
At a glance
| Measure | Kong | WSO2 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API gateway and management platform for microservices and cloud-native applications. | An open-source technology provider offering an open control plane for AI agents. |
| Category | API Management, Service Mesh, Cloud Native, Microservices | Artificial Intelligence, API Management, Integration, Identity and Access Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kong | WSO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 987 | 1,243 |
| Total funding | $511M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 76,804 | 203,455 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kong | WSO2 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kong | WSO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Kong vs WSO2: common questions
Which is better, Kong or WSO2?
On our 0-100 score WSO2 rates higher (54/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kong and WSO2 compare on the numbers?
Kong leads on funding raised ($511M against $63.0M). WSO2 leads on our overall score (54/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 41/100), headcount (1,243 against 987), LinkedIn following (203,455 against 76,804).
Read the full Kong review and pricing or the WSO2 review and pricing. You can also browse other Kong alternatives we track.