Kong vs StrongLoop
Kong vs StrongLoop, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kong is on 50/100 and StrongLoop on 37/100.
Where each one leads
Kong
- our overall score: 50/100 against 37/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 71/100
- funding raised: $511M against $9.0M
StrongLoop
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Kong | StrongLoop |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API gateway and management platform for microservices and cloud-native applications. | Enterprise Node.js platform for building and managing APIs and mobile applications. |
| Category | API Management, Service Mesh, Cloud Native, Microservices | API Platform, Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS), Mobile Backend, Microservices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kong | StrongLoop |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 987 | Not published |
| Total funding | $511M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series A |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 76,804 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kong | StrongLoop |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 37/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kong | StrongLoop |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Kong vs StrongLoop: common questions
Which is better, Kong or StrongLoop?
On our 0-100 score Kong rates higher (50/100 against 37/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kong and StrongLoop compare on the numbers?
Kong leads on our overall score (50/100 against 37/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100), domain rating (79/100 against 71/100), funding raised ($511M against $9.0M).
Read the full Kong review and pricing or the StrongLoop review and pricing. You can also browse other Kong alternatives we track.