Kong vs Solo.io
Kong vs Solo.io, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kong is on 50/100 and Solo.io on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Kong
- headcount: 987 against 132
- funding raised: $511M against $175M
Solo.io
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 41/100
At a glance
| Measure | Kong | Solo.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API gateway and management platform for microservices and cloud-native applications. | Enterprise agentic AI orchestration |
| Category | API Management, Service Mesh, Cloud Native, Microservices | Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Computing, Enterprise Software, API Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Cambridge, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kong | Solo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 987 | 132 |
| Total funding | $511M | $175M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series C |
| Valuation | $2.0B | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 76,804 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kong | Solo.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 19/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kong | Solo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Kong vs Solo.io: common questions
Which is better, Kong or Solo.io?
On our 0-100 score Solo.io rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kong and Solo.io compare on the numbers?
Kong leads on headcount (987 against 132), funding raised ($511M against $175M). Solo.io leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 41/100).
Read the full Kong review and pricing or the Solo.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Kong alternatives we track.