Kong vs KrakenD
Kong vs KrakenD, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kong is on 50/100 and KrakenD on 30/100.
Where each one leads
Kong
- our overall score: 50/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 67/100
- headcount: 987 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 76,804 against 3,011
KrakenD
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Kong | KrakenD |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API gateway and management platform for microservices and cloud-native applications. | High-performance API Gateway and microservices orchestration. |
| Category | API Management, Service Mesh, Cloud Native, Microservices | API Gateway, Microservices, Cloud Infrastructure, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Montevideo, Uruguay |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kong | KrakenD |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 987 | 12 |
| Total funding | $511M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 76,804 | 3,011 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kong | KrakenD |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kong | KrakenD |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Freshdesk |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Kong vs KrakenD: common questions
Which is better, Kong or KrakenD?
On our 0-100 score Kong rates higher (50/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kong and KrakenD compare on the numbers?
Kong leads on our overall score (50/100 against 30/100), domain rating (79/100 against 67/100), headcount (987 against 12), LinkedIn following (76,804 against 3,011).
Read the full Kong review and pricing or the KrakenD review and pricing. You can also browse other Kong alternatives we track.