Komodor vs OpenEBS
Komodor vs OpenEBS, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Komodor is on 63/100 and OpenEBS on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Komodor
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $67.0M against $26.0M
OpenEBS
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Komodor | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unified, dev-first Kubernetes platform for operations, troubleshooting, and cost optimization. | Cloud-native storage platform for Kubernetes, turning local storage into persistent volumes. |
| Category | Software Development, Kubernetes, Enterprise, DevOps | Cloud Native Storage, Kubernetes, Container Storage, DevOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Komodor | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 124 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $67.0M | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,445 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Komodor | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Komodor | OpenEBS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity +1 more | Google Analytics 4, Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Komodor vs OpenEBS: common questions
Which is better, Komodor or OpenEBS?
On our 0-100 score Komodor rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Komodor and OpenEBS compare on the numbers?
Komodor leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($67.0M against $26.0M).
Read the full Komodor review and pricing or the OpenEBS review and pricing. You can also browse other Komodor alternatives we track.