Komodor vs New Relic
Komodor vs New Relic, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Komodor is on 63/100 and New Relic on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Komodor
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
New Relic
- domain rating: 88/100 against 69/100
- headcount: 2,500 against 124
- funding raised: $7.2B against $67.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Komodor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unified, dev-first Kubernetes platform for operations, troubleshooting, and cost optimization. | A data observability company that helps enterprises monitor, debug, and optimize their software stack. |
| Category | Software Development, Kubernetes, Enterprise, DevOps | Enterprise Software, Observability, Application Performance Management, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Komodor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 124 | 2,500 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $67.0M | $7.2B |
| Latest round | Series B | Acquisition |
| Valuation | Not published | $6.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,445 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Komodor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | C (60/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Komodor | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity +1 more | Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Komodor vs New Relic: common questions
Which is better, Komodor or New Relic?
On our 0-100 score Komodor rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Komodor and New Relic compare on the numbers?
Komodor leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100). New Relic leads on domain rating (88/100 against 69/100), headcount (2,500 against 124), funding raised ($7.2B against $67.0M).
Read the full Komodor review and pricing or the New Relic review and pricing. You can also browse other Komodor alternatives we track.