Kofax vs Magic Software Enterprises
Kofax vs Magic Software Enterprises, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kofax is on 66/100 and Magic Software Enterprises on 23/100.
Where each one leads
Kofax
- our overall score: 66/100 against 23/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 1,567 against 482
- LinkedIn following: 62,493 against 8,981
Magic Software Enterprises
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Kofax | Magic Software Enterprises |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent automation software for process orchestration and digital workflow transformation. | Global provider of low-code development, integration, and industry solutions for digital transformation. |
| Category | Automation & RPA, Intelligent Automation, Robotic Process Automation, Cognitive Capture | Low Code, Integration Platform, Digital Transformation, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1985 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | Irvine, United States | Or Yehuda, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kofax | Magic Software Enterprises |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,567 | 482 |
| Total funding | $3.4M | Not published |
| Latest round | Not published | Bootstrapped |
| Valuation | $2.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 62,493 | 8,981 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kofax | Magic Software Enterprises |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 23/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kofax | Magic Software Enterprises |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Aspnet | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Kofax | Magic Software Enterprises |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (NASDAQ and TASE: MGIC) is a global provider of enterprise-grade application development and business process integration software solutions and a vendor of a broad range of software and IT services (hereafte”r/u/worldfinancialdata
Kofax vs Magic Software Enterprises: common questions
Which is better, Kofax or Magic Software Enterprises?
On our 0-100 score Kofax rates higher (66/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kofax and Magic Software Enterprises compare on the numbers?
Kofax leads on our overall score (66/100 against 23/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 47/100), headcount (1,567 against 482), LinkedIn following (62,493 against 8,981).
What do real users say about Kofax and Magic Software Enterprises?
Magic Software Enterprises: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/u/worldfinancialdata.
Read the full Kofax review and pricing or the Magic Software Enterprises review and pricing. You can also browse other Kofax alternatives we track.