Kodem vs Sweet Security
Kodem vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kodem is on 59/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Kodem
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 47/100
Sweet Security
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 119 against 59
- headcount growth: +126.9% against +29.7%
- funding raised: $128M against $18.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Kodem | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kodem generates and leverages runtime intelligence for enterprise application security. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, AppSec, Cybersecurity, Application Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kodem | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 59 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.7% | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $18.0M | $128M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,346 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kodem | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kodem | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
Kodem vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Kodem or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Sweet Security rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kodem and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Kodem leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 39/100), domain rating (53/100 against 47/100). Sweet Security leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100), headcount (119 against 59), headcount growth (+126.9% against +29.7%), funding raised ($128M against $18.0M).
Read the full Kodem review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Kodem alternatives we track.