Kling AI vs Luma AI
Kling AI vs Luma AI, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kling AI is on 61/100 and Luma AI on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Kling AI
- funding raised: $4.0B against $1.8B
Luma AI
- headcount: 367 against 62
- LinkedIn following: 118,880 against 4,028
At a glance
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kling AI provides state-of-the-art generative AI tools for creating imaginative images and videos, leveraging advanced foundation models like Kling 2.0 and Kolors 2.0. | Luma AI is building multimodal general intelligence that can generate, understand, and operate in the physical world, focusing on video, audio, and language learning. |
| Category | Generative AI, AI Video Generation, Foundation Model, Text to Video | Text to Video, Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2021 |
| Headquarters | China | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 62 | 367 |
| Total funding | $4.0B | $1.8B |
| Latest round | Initial | Series C |
| Valuation | $18B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,028 | 118,880 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 53/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | C (63/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Kling 2.0 & Kolors 2.0 Foundation Models, Kling 1.6 Elements Integration, FuzzyFuzzy AI Effect | Dream Machine, Ray2, Modify Video, Luma API, Camera Motion Concepts, Keyframe, Extend and Loop |
What users say
| Measure | Kling AI | Luma AI |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Kling AI vs Luma AI: common questions
Which is better, Kling AI or Luma AI?
On our 0-100 score Luma AI rates higher (63/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kling AI and Luma AI compare on the numbers?
Kling AI leads on funding raised ($4.0B against $1.8B). Luma AI leads on headcount (367 against 62), LinkedIn following (118,880 against 4,028).
Read the full Kling AI review and pricing or the Luma AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Kling AI alternatives we track.

