Klaviyo vs Tempo
Klaviyo vs Tempo, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Klaviyo is on 69/100 and Tempo on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Klaviyo
- our overall score: 69/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 2,866 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 145,500 against 51
Tempo
- funding raised: $570M against $373M
At a glance
| Measure | Klaviyo | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Klaviyo is the only CRM built for B2C brands, powered by a built-in data platform and AI insights to unify marketing automation, analytics, and customer service for personalized experiences and accelerated growth. | Tempo is an AI-powered email marketing agent that automates the planning, design, writing, and building of email campaigns for Shopify stores within Klaviyo, significantly reducing time and effort. |
| Category | Marketing Automation, E-commerce, SaaS, Customer Data Platform | MarTech, AdTech, E-commerce, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Klaviyo | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,866 | 4 |
| Total funding | $373M | $570M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $5K |
| LinkedIn followers | 145,500 | 51 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Klaviyo | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Klaviyo | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Astro | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Klaviyo | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | B2C CRM, Omnichannel Marketing, Klaviyo AI, Built-in Data Platform, Extensive Integrations, Customer Hub | Brand & Business Learning, Data-Driven Email Calendar, Ready-to-Send HTML Emails, Retention Agent, Segmentation & A/B Testing Recommendations, On-Brand Copywriting & Design |
Klaviyo vs Tempo: common questions
Which is better, Klaviyo or Tempo?
On our 0-100 score Klaviyo rates higher (69/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Klaviyo and Tempo compare on the numbers?
Klaviyo leads on our overall score (69/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 40/100), domain rating (90/100 against 42/100), headcount (2,866 against 4), LinkedIn following (145,500 against 51). Tempo leads on funding raised ($570M against $373M).
Read the full Klaviyo review and pricing or the Tempo review and pricing. You can also browse other Klaviyo alternatives we track.