Kinross Gold vs Redwood Materials
Kinross Gold vs Redwood Materials, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kinross Gold is on 50/100 and Redwood Materials on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Kinross Gold
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Redwood Materials
- our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
- funding raised: $1.1B against $500M
At a glance
| Measure | Kinross Gold | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kinross Gold Corporation is a Canadian-based gold and silver mining company founded in 1993 and headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. | Recycling and refining battery materials for electric vehicles and energy storage. |
| Category | Gold Mining, Silver Mining, Metals and Mining, Resource Extraction | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, EV Charging, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Mining | Services |
| Founded | 1993 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Carson City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kinross Gold | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 773 |
| Total funding | $500M | $1.1B |
| Latest round | Debt | Series E |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 78,725 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kinross Gold | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 48/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 31/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 65/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kinross Gold | Redwood Materials |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt |
Kinross Gold vs Redwood Materials: common questions
Which is better, Kinross Gold or Redwood Materials?
On our 0-100 score Redwood Materials rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kinross Gold and Redwood Materials compare on the numbers?
Redwood Materials leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), funding raised ($1.1B against $500M).
Read the full Kinross Gold review and pricing or the Redwood Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other Kinross Gold alternatives we track.