KingMakers vs TeamSnap
KingMakers vs TeamSnap, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: KingMakers is on 63/100 and TeamSnap on 59/100.
Where each one leads
KingMakers
- our overall score: 63/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 669 against 193
- LinkedIn following: 96,089 against 20,777
TeamSnap
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 19/100
- funding raised: $46.9M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | KingMakers | TeamSnap |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An African sports and iGaming platform connecting fans through innovative technology. | TeamSnap is a leading sports management platform for youth, recreational, and competitive sports organizations. |
| Category | Sports Tech, iGaming, Online Betting, Fantasy Sports | Sports Tech, Team Management Software, League Management Software, Youth Sports |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Malta, Malta | Boulder, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | KingMakers | TeamSnap |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 669 | 193 |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $46.9M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 96,089 | 20,777 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | KingMakers | TeamSnap |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 90/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | KingMakers | TeamSnap |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
| Analytics | Jetpack Stats | Amplitude |
| Support stack | Not detected | Helpscout |
KingMakers vs TeamSnap: common questions
Which is better, KingMakers or TeamSnap?
On our 0-100 score KingMakers rates higher (63/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do KingMakers and TeamSnap compare on the numbers?
KingMakers leads on our overall score (63/100 against 59/100), headcount (669 against 193), LinkedIn following (96,089 against 20,777). TeamSnap leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 29/100), domain rating (83/100 against 19/100), funding raised ($46.9M against $30.0M).
Read the full KingMakers review and pricing or the TeamSnap review and pricing. You can also browse other KingMakers alternatives we track.