Kiln vs Xpansiv
Kiln vs Xpansiv, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kiln is on 47/100 and Xpansiv on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Kiln
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Xpansiv
- our overall score: 57/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $100M against $2.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Kiln | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Carbon accounting and ESG reporting platform for businesses. | Global commodity data and analytics platform for ESG and energy markets. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Sustainability, ESG Reporting, Carbon Accounting | Climate Tech, Energy, Commodity Data, ESG |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kiln | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 250 |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 16,059 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kiln | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kiln | Xpansiv |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Kiln vs Xpansiv: common questions
Which is better, Kiln or Xpansiv?
On our 0-100 score Xpansiv rates higher (57/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kiln and Xpansiv compare on the numbers?
Xpansiv leads on our overall score (57/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($100M against $2.0M).
Read the full Kiln review and pricing or the Xpansiv review and pricing. You can also browse other Kiln alternatives we track.