Keep vs Wild Moose
Keep vs Wild Moose, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Keep is on 45/100 and Wild Moose on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Keep
- domain rating: 56/100 against 38/100
- LinkedIn following: 2,621 against 426
Wild Moose
- our overall score: 55/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 9 against 4
- headcount growth: +23.7% against +9.9%
- funding raised: $7.0M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Keep | Wild Moose |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source alert management platform using AI to reduce noise and improve alert actionability for engineers. | AI-powered conversational assistant for on-call developers to quickly diagnose production incidents. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Open Source, DevTools | Enterprise, Development, Observability, Logs |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Keep | Wild Moose |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 9 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.9% | +23.7% |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,621 | 426 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Keep | Wild Moose |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Keep | Wild Moose |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | PostHog | PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Keep vs Wild Moose: common questions
Which is better, Keep or Wild Moose?
On our 0-100 score Wild Moose rates higher (55/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Keep and Wild Moose compare on the numbers?
Keep leads on domain rating (56/100 against 38/100), LinkedIn following (2,621 against 426). Wild Moose leads on our overall score (55/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 37/100), headcount (9 against 4), headcount growth (+23.7% against +9.9%), funding raised ($7.0M against $2.5M).
Read the full Keep review and pricing or the Wild Moose review and pricing. You can also browse other Keep alternatives we track.