Keep vs Monte Carlo
Keep vs Monte Carlo, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Keep is on 45/100 and Monte Carlo on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Keep
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Monte Carlo
- our overall score: 70/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 549 against 4
- headcount growth: +31.0% against +9.9%
- funding raised: $236M against $2.5M
- LinkedIn following: 40,281 against 2,621
At a glance
| Measure | Keep | Monte Carlo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open-source alert management platform using AI to reduce noise and improve alert actionability for engineers. | Data observability platform for data reliability and quality. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Open Source, DevTools | Enterprise, Data, Development, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Keep | Monte Carlo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 549 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.9% | +31.0% |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $236M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,621 | 40,281 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Keep | Monte Carlo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 55/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Keep | Monte Carlo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Keep vs Monte Carlo: common questions
Which is better, Keep or Monte Carlo?
On our 0-100 score Monte Carlo rates higher (70/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Keep and Monte Carlo compare on the numbers?
Monte Carlo leads on our overall score (70/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 37/100), domain rating (72/100 against 56/100), headcount (549 against 4), headcount growth (+31.0% against +9.9%), funding raised ($236M against $2.5M), LinkedIn following (40,281 against 2,621).
Read the full Keep review and pricing or the Monte Carlo review and pricing. You can also browse other Keep alternatives we track.